ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Computed tomography radiomic feature analysis of thymic epithelial tumors: Differentiation of thymic epithelial tumors from thymic cysts and prediction of histological subtypes.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative risk stratification of mediastinal masses using a predictive model based on CT radiomics and clinical data.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Anterior mediastinal masses and thymic cysts.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) radiomic feature analysis for the differential diagnosis between thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and thymic cysts, and prediction of histological subtypes of TETs. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four patients with TETs (13 low-risk and 9 high-risk thymomas, and 2 thymic carcinomas) and 12 with thymic cysts were included in this study. For each lesion, the radiomic features of a volume of interest covering the lesion were extracted from non-contrast enhanced CT images. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) method was used for the feature selection. Predictive models for differentiating TETs from thymic cysts (model A), and high risk thymomas + thymic carcinomas from low risk thymomas (model B) were created from the selected features. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomic feature analysis for differentiating among these tumors.
resultsIn model A, the selected 5 radiomic features for the model A were NGLDM_Contrast, GLCM_Correlation, GLZLM_SZLGE, DISCRETIZED_HISTO_Entropy_log2, and DISCRETIZED_HUmin. In model B, sphericity was the only selected feature. The area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of radiomic feature analysis were 1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-1), 100%, and 100%, respectively, for differentiating TETs from thymic cysts (model A), and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.53-0.99), 64%, and 100% respectively, for differentiating high-risk thymomas + thymic carcinomas from low-risk thymomas (model B).
conclusionCT radiomic analysis could be utilized as a non-invasive imaging technique for differentiating TETs from thymic cysts, and high-risk thymomas + thymic carcinomas from low-risk thymomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38010596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.