Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010580›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2023

Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold Shift Correlated with Body Weight and External-Ear Amplification in Chinchilla: a Preliminary Analysis.

Sarah K Grinn, Monica Trevino, Edward Lobarinas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah K GrinnCollege of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA. sarah.grinn@cmich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-5857
Monica TrevinoSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Edward LobarinasSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USCentral Michigan University · US

Funding

Effect of Inner Hair Cell Loss and Afferent Damage on Functional HearingR01DC014088 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI LOBARINAS, EDWARD · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExternal-ear amplification (EEA) has been shown to vary from 5-19 dB-A in large datasets of pediatric, adolescent, and adult human participants. However, variable EEA is an overlooked characteristic that likely plays a role in individual noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) susceptibility. A noise exposure varying 5-19 dB-A translates to high-EEA individuals theoretically experiencing 3-4 times greater NIHL risk than low-EEA individuals.

objectiveThe purpose of this preliminary analysis was to test the hypothesis that higher EEA is correlated with increased noise-induced threshold shift susceptibility.

designNine chinchillas were exposed to 4-kHz octave-band noise at 89 dB-SPL for 24 h. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were obtained pre-exposure, 24-h post-exposure, and 4-week post-exposure. Relationships between EEA and threshold shift were analyzed.

resultsOpen-ear EEA ranged 11-19 dB-SPL, and occluded-ear EEA ranged 10-21 dB-SPL. Higher occluded-ear EEA was correlated with increased NIHL susceptibility (p = 0.04), as was lower body weight (p = 0.01). Male animals exhibited more threshold shift than female animals (p = 0.02), lower body weight than female animals (p = 0.02), and higher occluded-ear EEA (male mean = 18 dB; female mean = 15 dB).

conclusionsTaken together, increased threshold shift susceptibility was observed in the smallest animals, animals with the highest occluded-ear EEA, and in male animals (which tended to have higher occluded-ear EEA). Given the established relationship between smaller body size and higher occluded-ear EEA, these preliminary results suggest that body size (and occluded-ear EEA; a function of body size) could be a potential, underlying driver of NIHL susceptibility differences, rather than true sex differences.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedNoiseAdolescentAnimalsAuditory ThresholdBody WeightChildChinchillaFemaleHearingHumansMaleAuditory brainstem responseExternal-ear amplificationHearing loss susceptibilityNoise-exposure

Identifiers

PMID38010580
PMCPMC10752858
OpenAlexW4389047082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.