Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010538›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2023

The heat is on: the impact of excessive temperature increments on complications of laser treatment for ureteral and renal stones.

Senol Tonyali, Maximilian Ferry von Bargen, Arif Ozkan, Christian Gratzke, Arkadiusz Miernik

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Thulium versus holmium: Which is safer for the removal of entombed stents?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Senol TonyaliDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. dr.senoltonyali@gmail.com.
Maximilian Ferry von BargenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Arif OzkanDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Christian GratzkeDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-9647
University of Freiburg · DEKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTechnological advancements in the field of urology have led to a paradigm shift in the management of urolithiasis towards minimally invasive endourological interventions, namely ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, concerns regarding the potential for thermal injury during laser lithotripsy have arisen, as studies have indicated that the threshold for cellular thermal injury (43 °C) can be exceeded, even with conventional low-power laser settings. This review aims to identify the factors that contribute to temperature increments during laser treatment using current laser systems and evaluate their impact on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo select studies for inclusion, a search was performed on online databases including PubMed and Google Scholar. Keywords such as 'temperature' or 'heat' were combined with 'lithotripsy', 'nephrolithotomy', 'ureteroscopy', or 'retrograde intrarenal surgery', both individually and in various combinations.

resultsVarious strategies have been proposed to mitigate temperature rise, such as reducing laser energy or frequency, shortening the duration of laser activation, increasing the irrigation fluid flow rate, and using room temperature or chilled water for irrigation. It is important to note that higher irrigation fluid flow rates should be approached cautiously due to potential increases in intrarenal pressure and associated infectious complications. The utilization of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) may offer benefits by facilitating irrigation fluid outflow, thereby reducing intrapelvic pressure and intrarenal fluid temperature.

conclusionAchieving a balance between laser power, duration of laser activation, and irrigation fluid rate and temperature appears to be crucial for urologists to minimize excessive temperature rise.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserUreterHot TemperatureHumansTemperatureUreteroscopyEndourologyLaser LithotripsyThermal InjuryUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID38010538
PMCPMC10693507
OpenAlexW4389050202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.