Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010507›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Automated Feeder-Detection Software for Renal Cell Carcinoma Embolization: A Retrospective Evaluation of Detection Rate Using Transarterial Time-Resolved Computed Tomography Angiography.

Yusuke Matsui, Koji Tomita, Mayu Uka, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Takahiro Kawabata, Kazuaki Munetomo, Shoma Nagata, Akira Kurozumi, Ayako Ujifuku, Toshihiro Iguchi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. y-matsui@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-7886
Koji TomitaDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Mayu UkaDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Noriyuki UmakoshiDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Takahiro KawabataDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuaki MunetomoDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Shoma NagataDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Akira KurozumiCentral Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Ayako UjifukuCentral Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Toshihiro IguchiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Takao HirakiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Okayama University Hospital · JPOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the detection rate of feeding arteries in renal cell carcinoma with automated feeder-detection software and determine the optimal imaging phase for accurate feeder detection with transarterial time-resolved computed tomography angiography. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe performance of automated feeder-detection software was retrospectively evaluated using transarterial renal time-resolved computed tomography angiography images of 15 renal cell carcinomas (mean size, 22.1 mm); the images were obtained via the renal artery using a hybrid angio-CT system with 320-row computed tomography, across nine phases with 0.5-s intervals over a contrast delay time of 1.0-5.0 s. Automated feeder-detection software was applied to each phase in all tumors (135 image series in total). The feeder-detection rate (i.e., sensitivity) in each phase was evaluated, and the number of false feeders demonstrated by the software was counted for each tumor.

resultsA total of 22 feeders were identified. The feeder-detection rate was the highest (95.5% [21/22]) at delay times of 1.5 s and 2.0 s and lower in later phases. At delay times of 1.0 s and 1.5 s, the software demonstrated no or only a few (≤ 3) false feeders in 93.3% (14/15) of the tumors. In later phases, however, many (≥ 4) false feeders were observed in > 50% of tumors.

conclusionThe automated feeder-detection software showed a favorable feeder-detection rate and may be useful in transarterial embolization for renal cell carcinoma. The optimal delay time to avoid the demonstration of false feeders and achieve a high detection accuracy was 1.5 s. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Case Series.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCarcinoma, Renal CellChemoembolization, TherapeuticKidney NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesSoftwareTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomography angiographyFour-dimensional computed tomographyKidneySoftwareTherapeutic embolization

Identifiers

PMID38010507
OpenAlexW4389047255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.