Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010464›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives on High-Quality Discharge Summaries.

Brittany Chatterton, Jennifer Chen, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Jennifer Karlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany ChattertonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. bmchatterton@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-9429
Jennifer ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Eleanor Bimla SchwarzDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer KarlinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

HRSA HHS T32HP30037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful transitions of care require communication between inpatient and outpatient physicians. The discharge summary is the main communication tool used by physicians during these transitions.

objectiveWith the goal of improving care transitions, we explored primary care physicians (PCPs) perspectives on characteristics of high-quality discharge summaries.

designWe conducted semi-structured individual interviews in this qualitative study and surveyed participants for sociodemographic characteristics.

participantsPCPs were recruited from multiple health systems in California. APPROACH: An interview guide was created by the study authors to solicit PCPs' experiences with discharge summaries and perspectives on four discharge summary templates previously used by large health systems. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and qualitative data were analyzed interactively through thematic analysis. KEY

resultsTwenty PCPs participated in interviews lasting an average of 35 min (range 26-47 min). Sixty percent were female. Most (70%) had trained in internal medicine (IM); 5% had trained in both IM and pediatrics and 25% in family medicine. Some (45%) participants practiced both inpatient and outpatient medicine; 55% had exclusively outpatient practices. Half worked in university-affiliated clinics, 15% community clinics, 15% public health clinics, 5% private practice, and 15% multiple clinic types. Many PCPs (65%) had been in practice for ≥ 10 years. Participants reported multiple concerns with typical discharge summaries, including frustration with lengthy documents containing information irrelevant to outpatient care. Suggested recommendations included beginning the discharge summary with action items, clear identification of incidental findings requiring follow-up, specifying reasons for any medication changes, and including dates for treatment regimens rather than expected duration of treatment. Participants highlighted the importance of feedback to trainees to assist in crafting succinct discharge summaries containing relevant information.

conclusionClinical training programs and healthcare systems must optimize discharge summaries for PCPs to achieve goals of providing high-quality care that improves population health.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePhysicians, Primary CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Discharge SummariesQualitative Researchdischarge summariesprimary care physicianstransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID38010464
PMCPMC11169121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.