Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010433›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of paediatric hydrocephalus: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katarzyna Julia Minta, Siddarth Kannan, Chandrasekaran Kaliaperumal

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Machine learning for endoscopic third ventriculostomy success prediction-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Letter to the Editor: Comments on the interpretation of forest plots in a meta-analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna Julia MintaUniversity of Aberdeen School of Medicine Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Rd, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. kate.minta@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3018-0693
Siddarth KannanSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Chandrasekaran KaliaperumalDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-5949
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of paediatric hydrocephalus.

methodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles published from 2000 to May 2023 (last search date May 6, 2023). Keywords searched included "endoscopic third ventriculostomy", "ventriculoperitoneal shunting", "paediatric population", and "outcomes". Using random-effects models, we compared success rates and complications of ETV and VPS. The primary outcome was ETV vs.VPS success rates, and the secondary outcome was post-treatment complications. Included studies reported on treatment success and complication rates.

resultsOut of 126 articles, 8 RCTs and 1 prospective study were included. Six studies reported primary outcome data (806 patients identified: 464 in ETV group, 342 in VPS group). Combined success rates were 81.8% (n = 283/346) for ETV and 86.7% (n = 182/210) for VPS (median follow-up 41 months). There was no difference in success rates between ETV and VPS groups (risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.90, I

conclusionsBoth ETV and VPS are viable surgical options for the management of paediatric hydrocephalus with similar success rates when used as first-line treatment. However, our study concluded that VPS results in a higher complication rate. REGISTRATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was formally registered in the PROSPERO International database under the registration number CRD42023452907 on the 29

Indexed as

HydrocephalusNeuroendoscopyThird VentricleVentriculoperitoneal ShuntVentriculostomyChildHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic third ventriculostomyHydrocephalusManagementVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID38010433
PMCPMC10972931
OpenAlexW4389056284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.