Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010426›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2024

Performance and reliability assessment of a lower dose, task-based scoliosis radiography protocol in pediatric patients.

Khalid Al-Dasuqi, Erin Taylor, Lauren Ehrlich, Daniel Cooperman, Adrienne Socci, Dominick Tuason, Matthew Hoerner, Lawrence Staib, Cicero T Silva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Khalid Al-DasuqiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Erin TaylorDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Lauren EhrlichDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Daniel CoopermanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Adrienne SocciDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Dominick TuasonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matthew HoernerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Lawrence StaibDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Cicero T SilvaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. cicero.silva@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-739X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up scoliosis radiographs are performed to assess the degree of spinal curvature and skeletal maturity, which can be done at lower radiation exposures than those in standard-dose radiography.

objectiveDescribe and evaluate a protocol that reduced the radiation in follow-up frontal-view scoliosis radiographs. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe implemented a postero-anterior lower dose modified-technique for scoliosis radiography with task-based definition of adequate image quality and use of technique charts based on target exposure index and patient's height and weight. We subsequently retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients who underwent a follow-up radiograph using the modified-technique after an initial standard-technique radiograph. We evaluated comparisons of proportions for subjective assessment with chi-squared tests, and agreements of reader's scores with intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. We determined incident air kerma, exposure index, deviation index/standard deviation, dose-area product (DAP), and effective dose for each radiograph. We set statistical significance at P<0.05.

resultsForty patients (65% female), aged 4-17 years. Median effective dose was reduced from 39 to 10 µSv (P<0.001), incident air kerma from 139 to 29 µSv (P<0.001), and DAP from 266 to 55 mGy*cm

conclusionSubstantial dose reduction on follow-up scoliosis imaging with existing radiography units is achievable through task-based definition of adequate image quality and tailoring of radiation to each patient's height and weight, while still allowing for reliable assessment and reproducible measurements.

Indexed as

ScoliosisChildFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesDose reductionPediatricsRadiographyScoliosisSlot scanningSpineTask-based

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.