Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010419›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

Transitioning from face-to-face to distance education. Part 1: A cross-sectional study in the former Yugoslavia during COVID-19.

Irena Zakarija-Grković, Aleksandar Stepanović, Davorina Petek, Marion Tomičić, Zlata Ožvačić, Venija Cerovecki, Igor Švab, Vesna Homar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irena Zakarija-GrkovićDepartment of Clinical Skills, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-6017
Aleksandar StepanovićDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-0001
Davorina PetekDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0151-4463
Marion TomičićDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2148-3227
Zlata OžvačićDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-6353
Venija CeroveckiDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2670-8712
Igor ŠvabDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-4974
Vesna HomarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-6625
University of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Split · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe countries of the former Yugoslavia have health and education systems with the same tradition but these have changed over the years. Little is known about how family medicine teaching transitioned from face-to-face to distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectivesto investigate student/teacher experience in transitioning from face-to-face to distance education.

methodsA cross-sectional, online survey was conducted among 21 medical schools of the former Yugoslavia between December 2021 and March 2022. Under/postgraduate teachers and students who taught/studied family medicine during the academic year 2020/2021 were invited to participate. Of 31 questions for students and 35 for teachers, all but nine open questions were analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsSeventeen of 21 medical schools contributed data involving 117 participants representing all countries of the former Yugoslavia. At the beginning of the pandemic, 30%, 26% and 15% of teachers, students and trainees, respectively, received formal preparation in distance education. Of these, 92% of teachers and 58% of students/trainees felt they were not adequately prepared. Synchronous teaching was the main method used, with a third using hybrid methods. All participants were least confident about online assessment. More than 75% of respondents agreed that lectures could be kept online, not patient consultations or practical skills' classes.

conclusionTeachers used various old and new methods to provide learning opportunities despite COVID-19 constraints. Effective technology-based strategies are essential to ensure assessment integrity and enhance the learning environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsYugoslaviaCOVID-19 pandemicdistance educationfamily medicinestudentsteacherstrainees

Identifiers

PMID38010419
PMCPMC10990255
OpenAlexW4389046082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.