ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Working towards risk stratification for ascending aortic dilatation in pediatric Turner syndrome patients: results of a longitudinal echocardiographical observation.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic features and postoperative outcomes in Turner syndrome with congenital heart disease.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- The transcriptomic landscape of monosomy X (45,X) during early human fetal and placental development.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during transition care in adolescents with Turner syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to longitudinally evaluate aortic root dimensions and elasticity in pediatric Turner syndrome (TS) in relation to known cardiac implications such as coarctation of the aorta (CoA) and bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) in order to create an improved risk profile for the presumed underlying vessel pathology in childhood. We report on the longitudinal findings of our pediatric TS outpatient clinic over a period of up to 7.6 years. Forty-nine TS patients (median age at baseline 9.7 ± 5.9 years, range 0-19.8) were followed-up for on average 2.9 ± 1.1 examinations and a median time of 3.4 ± 1.6 years. Aortic root (AoR) diameters and corresponding Z-scores were determined echocardiographically, and elasticity parameters as well as annual progression rates were calculated. At baseline, 16.3% of patients showed Z-scores > 2 at one or more levels of the AoR (35.7% of patients with BAV, odds ratio of 4.2). There was net progression to be noted at all measuring levels, leading to 28.6% of patients (50% of patients with BAV) exhibiting aortic dilatation at the end of follow-up. Progression correlated with the presence of BAV, non-mosaic monosomy, and age. A levelling-off of progression was seen with the onset of adolescence.
conclusionsMarked progression of aortic diameters leading to the development of dilatation can be observed in TS patients during childhood and stresses the importance of close surveillance during childhood. Main risk factors are BAV and complete monosomy 45X0. A beneficial influence of estrogen substitution can be suspected but needs further investigation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Patients with Turner syndrome are at an increased risk for aortic dilatation and dissection. • The presence of BAV and complete monosomy 45X are additional risk factors. WHAT IS NEW: • Aortic dilatation can be detected in pediatric patients with Turner syndrome. • Relevant progression in childhood is possible in at-risk individuals and warrants close surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.