Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010355›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Baited reconstruction with 2D template matching for high-resolution structure determination in vitro and in vivo without template bias.

Bronwyn A Lucas, Benjamin A Himes, Nikolaus Grigorieff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cryo-EM single-particle analysis expanding towards increasingly native samples.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bronwyn A LucasRNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-0421
Benjamin A HimesRNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-0298
Nikolaus GrigorieffRNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-909X
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative 2021-234617 (5022)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously we showed that 2D template matching (2DTM) can be used to localize macromolecular complexes in images recorded by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with high precision, even in the presence of noise and cellular background (Lucas et al., 2021; Lucas et al., 2022). Here, we show that once localized, these particles may be averaged together to generate high-resolution 3D reconstructions. However, regions included in the template may suffer from template bias, leading to inflated resolution estimates and making the interpretation of high-resolution features unreliable. We evaluate conditions that minimize template bias while retaining the benefits of high-precision localization, and we show that molecular features

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRibosomesCryoelectron MicroscopyMacromolecular SubstancesMacromolecular Substances3D structurecell biologycryo-EME. colielectron microscopyimage analysisin situmolecular biophysicsribosomeS. cerevisiaestructural biology

Identifiers

PMID38010355
PMCPMC10681363
OpenAlexW4386742923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.