Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010228›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2024

A career exploration didactic and simulation-based session increases student knowledge in and exposure to urology.

S Mohammad Mohaghegh, Colin Kleinguetl, Tyler Sheetz, John Patrick Mershon, Matthew Murtha, Steven Goldenthal, Eric Riedinger, Cheryl T Lee, Courtenay K Moore, Aliza Khuhro and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S Mohammad MohagheghDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Colin KleinguetlDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Tyler SheetzDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
John Patrick MershonDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Matthew MurthaDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Steven GoldenthalDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Eric RiedingerDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Cheryl T LeeDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Courtenay K MooreDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Aliza KhuhroDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Hafsa AsifDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Chase ArnoldDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Tasha PosidDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThough urology attracts well-qualified applicants, students are not typically provided exposure to this smaller specialty until later in their medical education. While simulation-based training continues to supplement medical education, there is a lack of programming to teach specialty-specific procedural skills to medical students and those outside the specialty. We report a half-day simulation and didactic-based approach to increase exposure to urology to interested second-year medical students.

methodsA half-day didactic- and simulation-based session was offered to second-year medical students (N=57). After a didactic-based overview of the specialty performed by urology providers and a surgical educator, the students participated in small-group simulations, including hands-on simulations. The students completed a post-curriculum survey measuring knowledge gains and soliciting feedback on the session.

resultsStudents were 57.1% Caucasian, 66.7% female, with a mean age of 24.2 years; 80% stated they were potentially interested in pursuing a surgical specialty such as urology prior to the start of the session. Students reported pre- to post-curriculum gains in knowledge (mean=37%) about a career in urology and basic urologic procedures (p<0.001). Participants were also likely to recommend the curriculum to their peers (p<0.001).

conclusionsGiven that exposure to urology in medical school is usually limited and offered later in training, a half-day didactic- and simulation-based experience for second-year students provides an early introduction and experience within the specialty and its common bedside procedures.

Identifiers

PMID38010228
PMCPMC11034959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.