ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Optimization of the flip angles of narrow-band editing pulses in J-difference edited MRS of lactate at 3T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Pediatric Neuroimaging: Key Concepts for Practice.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeApplication of highly selective editing RF pulses provides a means of minimizing co-editing of contaminants in J-difference MRS (MEGA), but it causes reduction in editing yield. We examined the flip angles (FAs) of narrow-band editing pulses to maximize the lactate edited signal with minimal co-editing of threonine.
methodsThe effect of editing-pulse FA on the editing performance was examined, with numerical and phantom analyses, for bandwidths of 17.6-300 Hz in MEGA-PRESS editing of lactate at 3T. The FA and envelope of 46 ms Gaussian editing pulses were tailored to maximize the lactate edited signal at 1.3 ppm and minimize co-editing of threonine. The optimized editing-pulse FA MEGA scheme was tested in brain tumor patients.
resultsSimulation and phantom data indicated that the optimum FA of MEGA editing pulses is progressively larger than 180° as the editing-pulse bandwidth decreases. For 46 ms long 17.6 Hz bandwidth Gaussian pulses and other given sequence parameters, the lactate edited signal was maximum at the first and second editing-pulse FAs of 241° and 249°, respectively. The edit-on and difference-edited lactate peak areas of the optimized FA MEGA were greater by 43% and 25% compared to the 180°-FA MEGA, respectively. In-vivo data confirmed the simulation and phantom results. The lesions of the brain tumor patients showed elevated lactate and physiological levels of threonine.
conclusionThe lactate MEGA editing yield is significantly increased with editing-pulse FA much larger than 180° when the editing-pulse bandwidth is comparable to the lactate quartet frequency width.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.