Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38009915›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2023

Programmed chromosome fragmentation in ciliated protozoa: multiple means to chromosome ends.

Mireille Bétermier, Lawrence A Klobutcher, Eduardo Orias

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution and ecology of commensal gut protists: recent advances.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genome content in the non-model ciliatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mireille BétermierDepartment of Genome Biology, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Lawrence A KlobutcherDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UCONN Health (University of Connecticut), Farmington, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-3482
Eduardo OriasDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUConn Health · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-14-CE10-0005, ANR-18-CE12-0005-02, ANR-21-CE12-0019-01Centre National de la Recherch Scientifique (CNRS) NAFondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM) FRM EQU202103012766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ciliated protozoa undergo large-scale developmental rearrangement of their somatic genomes when forming a new transcriptionally active macronucleus during conjugation. This process includes the fragmentation of chromosomes derived from the germline, coupled with the efficient healing of the broken ends by

Indexed as

ChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsBase SequenceDNA, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanDNA Transposable Elementschromosome fragmentationciliated protozoaIESsParameciumspirotrichtelomeresTetrahymenatransposons

Identifiers

PMID38009915
PMCPMC10732028
OpenAlexW4389035904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.