Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38009702›Full record

Trial reportEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2026

Moderators of treatment effect in a randomised controlled trial of single- and multi-family therapy for anorexia nervosa in adolescents and emerging adults.

Julian Baudinet, John Hodsoll, Ulrike Schmidt, Mima Simic, Sabine Landau, Ivan Eisler

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Family therapy for emerging adults with anorexia nervosa: Expert opinion on evidence, practice considerations, and future directions.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julian BaudinetCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-4158
John HodsollDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-9901
Ulrike SchmidtCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1335-1937
Mima SimicMaudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4900-1429
Sabine LandauDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-8075
Ivan EislerCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8211-7514
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W002418/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMulti-family therapy for anorexia nervosa (MFT-AN) is a novel, group-based intervention that intensifies single-family therapy for anorexia nervosa (FT-AN), with the aim of improving outcomes. The current study explored treatment moderators in a randomised controlled trial (N = 167) of FT-AN and MFT-AN for young people (adolescents/emerging adults aged 13-20 years) with anorexia nervosa.

methodsData were analysed using multiple linear regression. Six hypothesised baseline participant and parent factors were tested as possible moderators of treatment effect on end-of-treatment and follow-up percentage of median Body Mass Index (%mBMI); age, eating disorder symptom severity, perceived family conflict (young person and parent ratings) and parent-rated experiences of caregiving (positive and negative).

resultsGreater parent-rated positive caregiving experiences moderated treatment outcomes at follow-up (β = -0.47, 95%CI: -0.91, -0.03, p = 0.04), but not end-of-treatment. Participants who had fewer parent-rated positive caregiving experiences at baseline had higher weight at follow-up if they had MFT-AN compared to FT-AN. No other hypothesised baseline factors moderated treatment outcome (p's > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The current study suggests MFT-AN may be indicated for families who present with fewer positive caregiving experiences to treatment. The MFT-AN group context may help to promote mentalisation and hope for these families, which may be harder to achieve in single-family treatment. Future research is needed to empirically evaluate how and why MFT-AN supports this group more.

trial registrationISRCTN registry: ISRCTN11275465, registered 29 January 2007.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaFamily TherapyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleParentsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultadolescentsanorexia nervosaemerging adultsfamily‐based treatmentfamily therapygroupMaudsley family therapymulti‐family therapyrandomised controlled trialtransition age youth

Identifiers

PMID38009702
PMCPMC12694694
OpenAlexW4389037189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.