ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023
Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel GnRH-Based Immunocastration Vaccine Modulates Growth, Reproductive and Meat Quality Traits in Male Leizhou Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Investigations on semen analysis capabilities and quality control measures in laboratories with different management modes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe performance evaluation of each computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system may provide a basis for the interpretation of clinical results and further improvement of the CASA system.
methodsThe accuracy of the GSA-810 CASA system was evaluated by detecting latex bead quality control products. The precision of sperm concentration, morphology, and percentages of progressively motile sperm (PR) were evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV). Three samples with sperm concentration of about 100 × 10
resultsThe detection values of latex beads were within the range of target values. The CVs of sperm concentration and PR were significantly and negatively correlated with sperm concentration (r = -0.561, p = 0.001) and PR value (r = -0.621, p < 0.001), respectively. The R
conclusionThe GSA-810 system can accurately analyze normal semen samples, but the repeatability of the results is poor for oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia samples. The future CASA system for analyzing sperm morphology should focus on recognizing the middle and tail segments of a spermatozoon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.