ArticleCurrent protocols2023
Repli-seq Sample Preparation using Cell Sorting with Cell-Permeant Dyes.
Article in Current protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- REPLAY: A reproducible and user-friendly application for DNA replication timing analysis from Repli-seq data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Parallel analysis of replication timing, gene expression, and copy number with PARTAGE.Genome research · 2026Article
- PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Single cell multiomics approach to analyze replication timing and gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Replication timing is significantly correlated with gene expression and chromatin organization, changes dynamically during cell differentiation, and is altered in diseased states. Genome-wide analysis of replication timing is performed in actively replicating cells by Repli-seq. Current methods for Repli-seq require cells to be fixed in large numbers. This is a barrier for sample types that are sensitive to fixation or are in very limited numbers. In this article, we outline optimized methods to process live cells and intact nuclei for Repli-seq. Our protocol enables the processing of a smaller number of cells per sample and reduces processing time and sample loss while obtaining high-quality data. Further, for samples that tend to form clumps and are difficult to dissociate into a single-cell suspension, we also outline methods for isolation, staining, and processing of nuclei for Repli-seq. The Repli-seq data obtained from live cells and intact nuclei are comparable to those obtained from the standard protocols. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Live cell isolation and staining Alternate Protocol: Nuclei isolation and staining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.