Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38008756›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2023

RSK3 switches cell fate: from stress-induced senescence to malignant progression.

Anda Huna, Jean-Michel Flaman, Catalina Lodillinsky, Kexin Zhu, Gabriela Makulyte, Victoria Pakulska, Yohann Coute, Clémence Ruisseaux, Pierre Saintigny, Hector Hernandez-Vargas and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anda HunaCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Jean-Michel Flaman *Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Catalina Lodillinsky *INSERM UMR_S 938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, CRSA, University Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Kexin ZhuCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Gabriela MakulyteCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Victoria PakulskaUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, UA13 BGE, CNRS, CEA, FR2048, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Yohann CouteUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, UA13 BGE, CNRS, CEA, FR2048, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Clémence RuisseauxCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Pierre SaintignyCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Hector Hernandez-VargasCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
Pierre-Antoine DefossezEpigenetics and Cell Fate Centre, CNRS UMR 7216, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Mathieu BoissanINSERM UMR_S 938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, CRSA, University Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Nadine MartinCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France.
David BernardCancer Research Center of Lyon, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, 69373, Lyon, France. david.bernard@lyon.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-2074
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInserm · FR

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer PLBio 15-013Institut National Du Cancer PLBio 18-144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTGFβ induces several cell phenotypes including senescence, a stable cell cycle arrest accompanied by a secretory program, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in normal epithelial cells. During carcinogenesis cells lose the ability to undergo senescence in response to TGFβ but they maintain an EMT, which can contribute to tumor progression. Our aim was to identify mechanisms promoting TGFβ-induced senescence escape.

methodsIn vitro experiments were performed with primary human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) immortalized by hTert. For kinase library screen and modulation of gene expression retroviral transduction was used. To characterize gene expression, RNA microarray with GSEA analysis and RT-qPCR were used. For protein level and localization, Western blot and immunofluorescence were performed. For senescence characterization crystal violet assay, Senescence Associated-β-Galactosidase activity, EdU staining were conducted. To determine RSK3 partners FLAG-baited immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses were performed. Proteosome activity and proteasome enrichment assays were performed. To validate the role of RSK3 in human breast cancer, analysis of METABRIC database was performed. Murine intraductal xenografts using MCF10DCIS.com cells were carried out, with histological and immunofluorescence analysis of mouse tissue sections.

resultsA screen with active kinases in HMECs upon TGFβ treatment identified that the serine threonine kinase RSK3, or RPS6KA2, a kinase mainly known to regulate cancer cell death including in breast cancer, reverted TGFβ-induced senescence. Interestingly, RSK3 expression decreased in response to TGFβ in a SMAD3-dependent manner, and its constitutive expression rescued SMAD3-induced senescence, indicating that a decrease in RSK3 itself contributes to TGFβ-induced senescence. Using transcriptomic analyses and affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we unveiled that RSK3 regulates senescence by inhibiting the NF-κΒ pathway through the decrease in proteasome-mediated IκBα degradation. Strikingly, senescent TGFβ-treated HMECs display features of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and during RSK3-induced senescence escaped HMECs conserve EMT features. Importantly, RSK3 expression is correlated with EMT and invasion, and inversely correlated with senescence and NF-κΒ in human claudin-low breast tumors and its expression enhances the formation of breast invasive tumors in the mouse mammary gland.

conclusionsWe conclude that RSK3 switches cell fate from senescence to malignancy in response to TGFβ signaling.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAnimalsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansMiceProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteomicsRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDaSignal TransductionTransforming Growth Factor betaProteasome Endopeptidase Complexribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90kDa, polypeptide 3Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDaTransforming Growth Factor betaBreast tumorCellular senescenceEpithelial-mesenchymal transitionTGFβ

Identifiers

PMID38008756
PMCPMC10680185
OpenAlexW4389031408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.