Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38008714›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Comprehensive probiogenomics analysis of the commensal Escherichia coli CEC15 as a potential probiotic strain.

Tales Fernando da Silva, Rafael de Assis Glória, Thiago Jesus de Sousa, Monique Ferrary Americo, Andria Dos Santos Freitas, Marcus Vinicius Canário Viana, Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus, Ligia Carolina da Silva Prado, Nathalie Daniel, Olivia Ménard and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tales Fernando da Silva1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Rafael de Assis GlóriaDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Thiago Jesus de SousaDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Monique Ferrary AmericoDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Andria Dos Santos Freitas1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Marcus Vinicius Canário VianaDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luís Cláudio Lima de JesusDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ligia Carolina da Silva Prado1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Nathalie Daniel1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Olivia Ménard1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Marie-Françoise Cochet1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Didier Dupont1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Julien Jardin1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Amanda Dias BorgesDepartment of clinical and toxicological analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Simone Odília Antunes FernandesDepartment of clinical and toxicological analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Valbert Nascimento CardosoDepartment of clinical and toxicological analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bertram BrenigDepartment of Molecular Biology of Livestock, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Enio FerreiraDepartment of general pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodrigo ProfetaDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Flavia Figueira AburjaileDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodrigo Dias Oliveira de CarvalhoFederal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Philippe LangellaUniversité Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR1319, MICALIS, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Yves Le Loir1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Claire CherbuyUniversité Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR1319, MICALIS, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gwénaël Jan1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France.
Vasco AzevedoDepartment of Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Éric Guédon1INRAE, Institut Agro, STLO, UMR1253, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042, Rennes, Cedex, France. eric.guedon@inrae.fr.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRLaboratoire Science & technologie du Lait & de l'œuf · FRAgroParisTech · FRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotics have gained attention for their potential maintaining gut and immune homeostasis. They have been found to confer protection against pathogen colonization, possess immunomodulatory effects, enhance gut barrier functionality, and mitigate inflammation. However, a thorough understanding of the unique mechanisms of effects triggered by individual strains is necessary to optimize their therapeutic efficacy. Probiogenomics, involving high-throughput techniques, can help identify uncharacterized strains and aid in the rational selection of new probiotics. This study evaluates the potential of the Escherichia coli CEC15 strain as a probiotic through in silico, in vitro, and in vivo analyses, comparing it to the well-known probiotic reference E. coli Nissle 1917. Genomic analysis was conducted to identify traits with potential beneficial activity and to assess the safety of each strain (genomic islands, bacteriocin production, antibiotic resistance, production of proteins involved in host homeostasis, and proteins with adhesive properties). In vitro studies assessed survival in gastrointestinal simulated conditions and adhesion to cultured human intestinal cells. Safety was evaluated in BALB/c mice, monitoring the impact of E. coli consumption on clinical signs, intestinal architecture, intestinal permeability, and fecal microbiota. Additionally, the protective effects of both strains were assessed in a murine model of 5-FU-induced mucositis.

resultsCEC15 mitigates inflammation, reinforces intestinal barrier, and modulates intestinal microbiota. In silico analysis revealed fewer pathogenicity-related traits in CEC15, when compared to Nissle 1917, with fewer toxin-associated genes and no gene suggesting the production of colibactin (a genotoxic agent). Most predicted antibiotic-resistance genes were neither associated with actual resistance, nor with transposable elements. The genome of CEC15 strain encodes proteins related to stress tolerance and to adhesion, in line with its better survival during digestion and higher adhesion to intestinal cells, when compared to Nissle 1917. Moreover, CEC15 exhibited beneficial effects on mice and their intestinal microbiota, both in healthy animals and against 5FU-induced intestinal mucositis.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the CEC15 strain holds promise as a probiotic, as it could modulate the intestinal microbiota, providing immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects, and reinforcing the intestinal barrier. These findings may have implications for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly some forms of diarrhea.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsMucositisProbioticsAnimalsEscherichia coliHumansInflammationMiceEscherichia coli ProteinsEscherichia coli CEC15Escherichia coli Nissle 1917Gastrointestinal tractGenomicsImmunomodulationMucositisProbiogenomicsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID38008714
PMCPMC10680302
OpenAlexW4389055642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.