Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38008595›Full record

ReviewHematology, transfusion and cell therapy

Barriers and motivations for blood donation: an integrative review.

Tiago Henrique Monteiro, Ítalo de Jesus da Rocha Ferreira, Antonio Carlos Fonseca Pontes Junior, Humberto Sanches Chocair, Jeniffer Dantas Ferreira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiago Henrique MonteiroUniversidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
Ítalo de Jesus da Rocha FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos Fonseca Pontes JuniorUniversidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
Humberto Sanches ChocairUniversidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
Jeniffer Dantas FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, AC, Brazil. Electronic address: jeniffer.ferreira@ufac.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt has been estimated that the proportion of blood donors in Brazil is below 2.0 %, lower than that recommended by the World Health Organization, which is between 3 % and 5 % of the population.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the factors that can influence blood donation.

methodThis is an integrative review, whose bibliographic search was carried out through the Virtual Health Library, considering scientific articles indexed in the Latin American and Caribbean Literature in the Health Sciences database.

resultsThis process was performed in July 2022 with term "blood donors" and 901 publications were identified, without delimitation of the study period or any other aspects. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 articles were fully reviewed. The studies were categorized according to the main content discussed in "characteristics and perspectives of donors", "perspective of health professionals and services" and "loyalty strategies: marketing and communication in health". Access to coherent information about the donation process was the motivational aspect evidenced in the three categories of analysis, that is, indispensable from the perspective of users, health professionals who work in blood therapy services and for marketing and communication in health. It is through the knowledge of the procedure that uncertainties and fear are decreased and loyal donors are increased.

conclusionAltruism was the most frequent driving feeling in the consulted literature, whereas the lack of time and fear were the routine obstacles. The campaigns were identified as communication and health education actions relevant to attracting and retaining the donor, as well as applications and social networks.

Indexed as

BloodBlood banksBlood donorsPublic healthReview

Identifiers

PMID38008595
PMCPMC11221270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.