Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38008218›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology. Retina2024

Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning.

Rajat S Chandra, Gui-Shuang Ying

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajat S ChandraPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gui-Shuang YingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: gsying@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Coordinating Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatments TrialsU10EY017823 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAGUIRE, MAUREEN G · 2006 to 2012
$19.2M
Photograph Reading Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017826 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRUNWALD, JUAN E · 2006 to 2013
$2.8M
Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials-OCT Reading CenterU10EY017825 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFE, GLENN · 2006 to 2013
$2.3M
Chair Grant for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017828 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, DANIEL F · 2006 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017823NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017825NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017826NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate multiple machine learning (ML) models for predicting 2-year visual acuity (VA) responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Treatments Trials (CATT) for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD).

designSecondary analysis of public data from a randomized clinical trial.

participantsA total of 1029 CATT participants who completed 2 years of follow-up with untreated active nAMD and baseline VA between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye.

methodsFive ML models (support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron neural network, and lasso) were applied to clinical and image data from baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 for predicting 4 VA outcomes (≥ 15-letter VA gain, ≥ 15-letter VA loss, VA change from baseline, and actual VA) at 2 years. The CATT data from 1029 participants were randomly split for training (n = 717), from which the models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation, and for final validation on a test data set (n = 312).

main outcome measuresPerformances of ML models were assessed by R

resultsUsing training data up to week 12, the ML models from cross-validation achieved mean R

conclusionsMachine learning models have the potential to predict 2-year VA response to anti-VEGF treatment using clinical and imaging features from the loading dose phase, which can aid in decision-making around treatment protocols for patients with nAMD. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsIntravitreal InjectionsMachine LearningRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleROC CurveTomography, Optical CoherenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGF therapyMachine learningPredictionVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID38008218
PMCPMC11070304
OpenAlexW4388980039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.