Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38008123›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Eva Nosková, Kelly M Sambucci, Klára J Petrželková, Barbora Červená, David Modrý, Barbora Pafčo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-throughput sequencing ofParasitology · 2024
    Article
  7. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva NoskováInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6257-4972
Kelly M SambucciInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Klára J PetrželkováInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Barbora ČervenáInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
David ModrýDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Barbora PafčoInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-0841
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZMasaryk University · CZCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates are an important source of infectious disease in humans. Strongyloidiasis affects an estimated 600 million people worldwide, with a global distribution and hotspots of infection in tropical and subtropical regions. Recently added to the list of neglected tropical diseases, global attention has been demanded in the drive for its control. Through a literature review of

Indexed as

StrongyloidesStrongyloidiasisAnimalsDogsHumansNeglected DiseasesPrimatesPublic Healthmicroscopymolecular methodsprimatesStrongyloides

Identifiers

PMID38008123
PMCPMC10676817
OpenAlexW4389030657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.