Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38007703›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Impact of a standardized protocol for chest tube management after VATS pulmonary resections on post-operative outcomes and complications.

Giovanni M Comacchio, Marco Mammana, Giorgio Cannone, Giovanni Zambello, Stefano Silvestrin, Alessandro Rebusso, Samuele Nicotra, Federico Rea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni M ComacchioThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. gcomacchio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-1843
Marco MammanaThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Giorgio CannoneThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni ZambelloThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Stefano SilvestrinThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro RebussoThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Samuele NicotraThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Federico ReaThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest tube management represents a major issue after lung surgery as no protocol is widely accepted and tube management is generally based on local or personal habits. Aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a standardized protocol for chest tube management after pulmonary resections on the post-operative outcomes. We performed a single center retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection from January 2020 to December 2021. Starting from January 2021 a standardized protocol of chest tube management was applied after all procedures. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chest tube management strategy. he two groups had similar pre-operative characteristics and the extent of lung resection was comparable. Intervention group had significantly shorter time to chest tube removal (median 1 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) and post-operative length of stay (median 3 vs 4 days, p < 0.001). Despite earlier chest tube removal, there was not an increased incidence of post-removal complications. On multivariable analysis, the new chest drain management strategy was an independent predictor of earlier chest tube removal. A standardized protocol of chest tube management allows for an earlier chest tube removal and a shorter hospital stay, without an increase in post-operative complications.

Indexed as

Chest TubesClinical ProtocolsDevice RemovalLength of StayPneumonectomyPostoperative ComplicationsThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChest tubeERASLung resectionStandard protocolVATS

Identifiers

PMID38007703
OpenAlexW4389012030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.