Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024
Association of energy delivery with short-term survival in mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients: a secondary analysis of the NEED trial.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional practices and impact of feeding adequacy on clinical outcomes in Chinese respiratory intensive care units patients: a prospective observational study (ORIENT study).Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Editorial of Special Issue "Nutrition and Critical Illness".Nutrients · 2024Article
- Personalized Nutrition in the Pediatric ICU: Steering the Shift from Acute Stress to Metabolic Recovery and Rehabilitation.Nutrients · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe optimal energy delivery for mechanically ventilated patients is controversial, particularly during the first week of ICU admission. This study aimed to investigate the association between different caloric adequacy and 28-day mortality in a cohort of critically ill adults on mechanical ventilation.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were divided into four quartiles (Q1-Q4) according to caloric adequacy calculated by the actual average daily energy delivery during the first seven days of ICU stay divided by energy requirement as a percentage. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the impact of different quartiles of caloric adequacy on 28-day mortality in the whole cohort and subgroups with different nutritional risk status at enrollment.
resultsA total of 1587 patients were included in this study, with an overall 28-day mortality of 15.8%. The average caloric adequacy was 26.3 ± 11.9% (Q1), 52.5 ± 5.5% (Q2), 71.7 ± 6.4% (Q3), 107.0 ± 22.2% (Q4), respectively (p < 0.001 among quartiles). Compared with Q1, Q3 was associated with lower mortality in the unadjusted model (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.536; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.375-0.767; P = 0.001) and adjusted model (adjusted HR = 0.508; 95% CI, 0.339-0.761; P = 0.001). This association remained valid in the subgroup of high nutritional risk patients (unadjusted HR = 0.387; 95% CI, 0.238-0.627; P < 0.001 and adjusted HR = 0.369; 95% CI, 0.216-0.630; P < 0.001, respectively), but not in those with low risk.
conclusionsEnergy delivery near the 70% energy requirements in the first week of ICU stay was associated with reduced 28-day mortality among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, especially in patients with high nutrition risk at admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38007601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.