Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38007472›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2023

The effect of animal-assisted interventions on the course of neurological diseases: a systematic review.

Veronika Mittly, Cecilia Farkas-Kirov, Ágnes Zana, Kata Szabó, Veronika Ónodi-Szabó, György Purebl

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronika MittlyInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad Square 4, 1089, Budapest, Hungary. mittly.veronika@dpckorhaz.hu.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-2501
Cecilia Farkas-KirovCreanova Organisation and Management Development Consulting Ltd., Zichy Géza Street 5, 1146, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes ZanaInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad Square 4, 1089, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-1776
Kata SzabóTámasz Foundation, Sándor Street 1, 7626, Pécs, Hungary.
Veronika Ónodi-SzabóYouthbuilders Foundation, Horánszky Street 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
György PureblInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad Square 4, 1089, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9750-2001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn our experience, working with a therapy animal strengthens endurance, maintains motivation, provides a sense of achievement, and boosts overall mental resilience. The aims of this work were to summarize the results of quantitative research on the possibilities of animal-assisted intervention (AAI) among people with neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases and to attempt to assess the effects of animal-assisted interventions in an objective manner and to find supporting evidence based on published literature.

methodsOur target groups are people diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, or stroke. A systematic search of relevant articles was conducted by two independent researchers in April 2021 and August 2023. The search for studies was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases, specifying keywords and search criteria. The qualitative evaluation of the research reports was conducted by four independent researchers, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form.

resultsAccording to the scientific criteria and based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form, thirteen publications met the search criteria, out of which 9 publications were rated good and 4 publications were rated poor. Evaluating the publications we found evidence that AAI had a measurable impact on participants, as their physical and mental health status significantly improved; however, mental health improvement was more prominent.

conclusionsBy developing evidence-based research methodology and standardized research settings, AAI could be measured effectively as part of health care practice. This would bring significant benefits to the rehabilitation of patients in need. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021255776.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMultiple SclerosisAnimalsDelivery of Health CareHumansActivities of daily livingAnimal-assisted therapyNervous system diseasesRecovery of functionRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38007472
PMCPMC10675848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.