Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38007433›Full record

ReviewBMC ophthalmology2023

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review.

Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada, Vito Romano, Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo, Joaquín Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Cataract surgery with corneal endothelial pathology.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-MoraQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, Almería, 04120, Spain.
Carlos Rocha-de-LossadaQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, Almería, 04120, Spain.
Vito RomanoOphthalmic Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Manuel Rodríguez-VallejoQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, Almería, 04120, Spain. manuelrodriguezid@qvision.es.
Joaquín FernándezQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, Almería, 04120, Spain.
University of Almería · ESAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It's advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There's a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.

Indexed as

CataractCorneal TransplantationDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyLenses, IntraocularPresbyopiaDescemet MembraneHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyEndothelial keratoplastyExtended-depth of focus intraocular lensesMultifocal intraocular lensesPresbyopia‐correcting intraocular lensesToric intraocular lenses

Identifiers

PMID38007433
PMCPMC10675930
OpenAlexW4388998577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.