Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38007408›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis: mapping the spectrum of impairment.

Damiano Mistri, Nicolò Tedone, Diana Biondi, Carmen Vizzino, Elisabetta Pagani, Maria A Rocca, Massimo Filippi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: from phenomenology to neurobiological mechanisms.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damiano MistriNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Nicolò TedoneNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Diana BiondiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Carmen VizzinoNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta PaganiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Maria A RoccaNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. filippi.massimo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0479
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable criteria for cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis (MS) do not consider the severity of impairment.

objectivesTo identify cognitive phenotypes with varying degrees of impairment in MS patients and describe their demographic, clinical and MRI characteristics.

methodsTwo hundred and forty-three MS patients and 158 healthy controls underwent neuropsychological tests to assess memory, attention, and executive function. For each domain, mild impairment was defined as performing 1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean on two tests, while the threshold for significant impairment was 2 standard deviations. Patients were classified into cognitive phenotypes based on severity of the impairment (mild/significant) and number of domains affected (one/more).

resultsFive cognitive phenotypes emerged: Preserved cognition (PC; 56%), Mild Single-Domain Impairment (MSD; 15%), Mild Multi-Domain Impairment (MMD; 9%), Significant Single-Domain Impairment (SSD; 12%), Significant Multi-Domain Impairment (SMD; 8%). Compared with PC, MSD patients were older, had longer disease duration (DD) and higher T2-hyperintense lesion volume (LV; all p ≤ 0.02); MMD patients were older, had longer DD, higher disability, higher T2 LV and lower thalamic volume (all p ≤ 0.01); SSD patients had longer DD and lower gray matter cortical volume, thalamic, caudate, putamen and accumbens volumes (all p ≤ 0.04); and SMD patients were older, had longer DD, higher disability and more extensive structural damage in all brain regions explored (all p ≤ 0.03), except white matter and amygdala volumes.

conclusionsWe identified five cognitive phenotypes with graded levels of impairment. These phenotypes were characterized by distinct demographic, clinical and MRI features, indicating potential variations in the neural substrates of dysfunction throughout disease stages.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAtrophyBrainCognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsCognitive dysfunctionCognitive phenotypesMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID38007408
OpenAlexW4389005128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.