Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38006903›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN2024

Association Between Recurrent Preeclampsia and Attendance at the Blood Pressure Monitoring Appointment After Birth.

Eleanor Saffian, Anna Palatnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eleanor Saffian
Anna Palatnik

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between recurrent preeclampsia and attendance at the standard of care blood pressure monitoring appointment after birth.

designRetrospective cohort.

settingSingle Magnet-accredited hospital affiliated with an academic medical center.

participantsMultiparous women who gave birth between 2010 and 2020 and were diagnosed with preeclampsia (N = 313).

methodsWe divided participants into two groups: those with prior preeclampsia (n = 119) and those without prior preeclampsia (n = 194). Using logistic regression, we calculated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios to estimate the association between attendance at the postpartum blood pressure (PPBP) monitoring appointment and prior preeclampsia. We also explored the relationship between attendance at the PPBP monitoring appointment and use of magnesium sulfate during labor and birth and the relationship between attendance at the PPBP monitoring appointment and use of maintenance antihypertensive medications.

resultsIn adjusted analysis, participants with prior preeclampsia were 66.4% less likely to attend the PPBP monitoring appointment compared with those without prior preeclampsia, adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.18, 0.62]. Administration of magnesium sulfate during delivery admission and use of maintenance antihypertensive medications were not associated with a change in attendance at the PPBP appointment.

conclusionFurther research on patient-perceived risk of recurrent preeclampsia and improvement of systems to facilitate postpartum follow-up is needed.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansMagnesium SulfatePregnancyRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsMagnesium Sulfateappointment attendancepostpartumrecurrent preeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID38006903
PMCPMC10939826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.