ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
A rare anatomical malformation of the sphenoid sinus: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral suspended optic nerve within the sphenoid sinus: a rare case report of a critical anatomical variant.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Anatomical Features of the Sphenoid Sinus and Their Clinical Significance in Transsphenoidal Accesses to the Pituitary Gland and Parasellar Region: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSphenoid sinuses, air-filled cavities in the sphenoid bone, develop between the 3rd and 4th year and mature by 12 to 16 years. Understanding their anatomy is vital for safe transsphenoidal surgeries because of nearby vital structures. They exhibit variable pneumatization and often have an intersinus septum. This case emphasizes the importance of understanding sphenoid sinus anatomy, particularly in the context of transsphenoidal surgeries. It also introduces a novel case involving a congenital roof defect, previously unreported in medical literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old male presented with left cheek swelling that progressed to the eyelid, accompanied by low visual acuity, nasal symptoms, and a high temperature. Clinical examination revealed purulent discharge. A CT scan indicated opacity in the left maxillary sinus and a roof defect in the left sphenoid sinus. However, endoscopic surgery revealed the sphenoid sinus to be normal. This indicates that the defect is congenital. A biopsy from the maxillary sinus lesion confirmed lymphoma, and he was sent to the oncology hospital. There was no extension of the maxillary sinus lesion into the sphenoid sinus. This unique case had no history of drainage, taste issues, meningitis, or pituitary surgery. DISCUSSION: The complete absence of the sphenoid sinus roof is a unique and rare anatomical anomaly with significant implications for surgical procedures. Transsphenoidal surgery, which benefits from endoscopic advancements, provides enhanced visualization but also poses risks due to the proximity to critical structures. Pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus typically reaches maturity during adolescence, with individual variations in extent, Septations, extensions, and asymmetry are common in sphenoid sinus anatomy. This underscores the need for surgeon awareness and adjusted surgical approaches in such rare instances.
conclusionsWe emphasize the importance of a thorough anatomical understanding through precise radiological study before any sinus surgery due to the possibility of unexpected anatomical abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.