ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Practical Prediction of New Baseline Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06973798 (The Study on the Effectiveness of [68Ga]Ga-HBED-CC-DiAsp PET/CT in Calculating Glomerular Filtration Rate and Predicting Residual Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Study on the Effectiveness of [68Ga]Ga-HBED-CC-DiAsp PET/CT in Calculating Glomerular Filtration Rate and Predicting Residual Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of algorithms for predicting new baseline renal function after complex partial nephrectomy for multifocal renal tumors.Urologic oncology · 2026Article
- A potential imaging-based predictor for renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Renal parenchymal volume analysis: Clinical and research applications.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Cumulative Impact of Serial Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Renal Masses.The Journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartial nephrectomy (PN) is generally preferred for localized renal masses due to strong functional outcomes. Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after PN may facilitate preoperative counseling because NBGFR may affect long-term survival, particularly for patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease. Methods for predicting parenchymal volume preservation, and by extension NBGFR, have been proposed, including those based on contact surface area (CSA) or direct measurement of tissue likely to be excised/devascularized during PN. We previously reported that presuming 89% of global GFR preservation (the median value saved from previous, independent analyses) is as accurate as the more subjective/labor-intensive CSA and direct measurement approaches. More recently, several promising complex/multivariable predictive algorithms have been published, which typically include tumor, patient, and surgical factors. In this study, we compare our conceptually simple approach (NBGFR PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 631 patients with bilateral kidneys who underwent PN at Cleveland Clinic (2012-2014) for localized renal masses with available preoperative/postoperative GFR were analyzed. NBGFR was defined as the final GFR 3-12 months post-PN. Predictive accuracies were assessed from correlation coefficients (r) and mean squared errors (MSE).
resultsOur conceptually simple approach based on uniform 90% functional preservation had equivalent r values when compared with complex, multivariable models, and had the lowest degree of error when predicting NBGFR post-PN.
conclusionsOur simple formula performs equally well as complex algorithms when predicting NBGFR after PN. Strong anchoring by preoperative GFR and minimal functional loss (≈ 10%) with the typical PN likely account for these observations. This formula is practical and can facilitate counseling about expected postoperative functional outcomes after PN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.