Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38006452›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental management2024

A Global Systematic Literature Review of Ecosystem Services in Reef Environments.

Vinicius J Giglio, Anaide W Aued, Cesar A M M Cordeiro, Linda Eggertsen, Débora S Ferrari, Leandra R Gonçalves, Natalia Hanazaki, Osmar J Luiz, André L Luza, Thiago C Mendes and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vinicius J GiglioUniversidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Campus Oriximiná, PA, Brazil. vj.giglio@gmail.com.
Anaide W AuedDepartamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Cesar A M M CordeiroLaboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil.
Linda EggertsenDepartamento de Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Débora S FerrariPrograma de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Leandra R GonçalvesInstituto do Mar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Natalia HanazakiDepartamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Osmar J LuizResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
André L LuzaDepartamento de Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Thiago C MendesDepartamento de Biologia Marinha, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Hudson T PinheiroCentro de Biologia Marinha, Universidade de São Paulo, São Sebastião, SP, Brazil.
Bárbara SegalDepartamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Luiza S WaechterDepartamento de Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Mariana G BenderDepartamento de Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 442417/2019-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) embrace contributions of nature to human livelihood and well-being. Reef environments provide a range of ES with direct and indirect contributions to people. However, the health of reef environments is declining globally due to local and large-scale threats, affecting ES delivery in different ways. Mapping scientific knowledge and identifying research gaps on reefs' ES is critical to guide their management and conservation. We conducted a systematic assessment of peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2022 to build an overview of ES research on reef environments. We analyzed the geographical distribution, reef types, approaches used to assess ES, and the potential drivers of change in ES delivery reported across these studies. Based on 115 articles, our results revealed that coral and oyster reefs are the most studied reef ecosystems. Cultural ES (e.g., subcategories recreation and tourism) was the most studied ES in high-income countries, while regulating and maintenance ES (e.g., subcategory life cycle maintenance) prevailed in low and middle-income countries. Research efforts on reef ES are biased toward the Global North, mainly North America and Oceania. Studies predominantly used observational approaches to assess ES, with a marked increase in the number of studies using statistical modeling during 2021 and 2022. The scale of studies was mostly local and regional, and the studies addressed mainly one or two subcategories of reefs' ES. Overexploitation, reef degradation, and pollution were the most commonly cited drivers affecting the delivery of provisioning, regulating and maintenance, and cultural ES. With increasing threats to reef environments, the growing demand for assessing the contributions to humans provided by reefs will benefit the projections on how these ES will be impacted by anthropogenic pressures. The incorporation of multiple and synergistic ecosystem mechanisms is paramount to providing a comprehensive ES assessment, and improving the understanding of functions, services, and benefits.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEcosystemAnimalsHumansCoastal livelihoodsEcosystem benefitsFood securityHuman well-beingMarine ecosystem servicesReef systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.