ReviewIntegrative cancer therapies
Shenqi Fuzheng Injection Combined With Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Review in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular targets and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and multi-omics approach.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Modulation of the gut microbiota by traditional Chinese medicine to attenuate chemotherapy-induced toxicity in gastric cancer: a review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Progress in Research on Alleviating the Symptoms Associated With Advanced Cancer Using Traditional Chinese Medicine.Pain research & management · 2026Review
- Comparisons of the efficacy of different Chinese medicine injections on immune function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during combined therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- A systematic review of the mechanism of action and potential medicinal value of codonopsis pilosula in diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignant tumor of the digestive tract. Chemotherapy (CT) is the primary treatment for GC, but it is accompanied by toxic side effects. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the combination of Shenqi Fuzheng injection (SFI) with CT for GC have been published; however, the conclusions have been inconsistent. This overview of SRs/MAs aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of SFI for GC, establishing a dependable foundation for its clinical application.
methodsWe utilized 7 databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed, to conduct our search. The retrieval period spanned from inception to August 2023. The methodological quality, bias risk, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the SRs/MAs were assessed using the evaluation tools AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE, respectively. Subsequently, the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the SRs/MAs were quantitatively analyzed through the implementation of RevMan 5.4 software.
resultsEleven SRs/MAs were included in this study, comprising 54 RCTs involving a total of 9539 patients with GC. The studies covered the period from 2012 to 2021, with the number of original RCTs per study ranging from 3 to 20 and sample sizes ranging from 159 to 1413. The methodological quality of all 11 SRs/MAs was assessed as low or very low, and the quality of evidence was determined to range from moderate to very low. The comprehensive quantitative meta-analysis revealed that the combination of SFI with CT improved the objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = [1.21, 1.41],
conclusionsSFI combined with CT can enhance the clinical effectiveness and enhance the quality of life in patients with GC, while minimizing adverse reactions. Nonetheless, the evaluation of overall quality remains deficient, thus restricting the reliability and stability of the conclusions. High-quality, large-sample RCTs remain crucial for establishing dependable clinical evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY20239004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.