Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38006019›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Comparative Analysis of Swine Antibody Responses following Vaccination with Live-Attenuated and Killed African Swine Fever Virus Vaccines.

Hung Q Luong, Huong T L Lai, Lam Q Truong, The N Nguyen, Hanh D Vu, Hoa T Nguyen, Lan T Nguyen, Trang H Pham, D Scott McVey, Hiep L X Vu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hung Q LuongNebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7372-0883
Huong T L LaiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-7672
Lam Q TruongFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
The N NguyenNebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Hanh D VuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Hoa T NguyenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Lan T NguyenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Trang H PhamFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
D Scott McVeySchool of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8321-3287
Hiep L X VuNebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8084-4358
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USVietnam National University of Agriculture · VN

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67015-37264Vietnam Ministry of Science and Technology 2012R1A1A4A01015303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is circulating in many swine-producing countries, causing significant economic losses. It is observed that pigs experimentally vaccinated with a live-attenuated virus (LAV) but not a killed virus (KV) vaccine develop solid homologous protective immunity. The objective of this study was to comparatively analyze antibody profiles between pigs vaccinated with an LAV vaccine and those vaccinated with a KV vaccine to identify potential markers of vaccine-induced protection. Thirty ASFV seronegative pigs were divided into three groups: Group 1 received a single dose of an experimental LAV, Group 2 received two doses of an experimental KV vaccine, and Group 3 was kept as a non-vaccinated (NV) control. At 42 days post-vaccination, all pigs were challenged with the parental virulent ASFV strain and monitored for 21 days. All pigs vaccinated with the LAV vaccine survived the challenge. In contrast, eight pigs from the KV group and seven pigs from the NV group died within 14 days post-challenge. Serum samples collected on 41 days post-vaccination were analyzed for their reactivity against a panel of 29 viral structural proteins. The sera of pigs from the LAV group exhibited a strong antibody reactivity against various viral structural proteins, while the sera of pigs in the KV group only displayed weak antibody reactivity against the inner envelope (p32, p54, p12). There was a negative correlation between the intensity of antibody reactivity against five ASFV antigens, namely p12, p14, p15, p32, and pD205R, and the viral DNA titers in the blood of animals after the challenge infection. Thus, antibody reactivities against these five antigens warrant further evaluation as potential indicators of vaccine-induced protection.

Indexed as

African swine fever virusantibody profilehumoral immunityinactivated vaccinelive attenuated vaccineluciferase-based immunoprecipitation system

Identifiers

PMID38006019
PMCPMC10674706
OpenAlexW4388304764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.