Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38005997›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Safety, Efficacy, and Ill Intent: Examining COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions among the New Undervaccinated Moveable Middle in a U.S. Cohort, October 2022.

Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Kate Penrose, Eva Stanton, Angela M Parcesepe, Yanhan Shen, Sasha A Fleary, Denis Nash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael Piltch-LoebDepartment of Environmental Occupational and Geospatial Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA.
Kate PenroseInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7808-7439
Eva StantonEmergency Preparedness Research Evaluation and Practice Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Angela M ParcesepeDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
Yanhan ShenInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA.
Sasha A FlearyInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA.
Denis NashInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUH3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.9M
Brief digital intervention to increase COVID-19 vaccination among individuals with anxiety or depressionRF1MH132360 · NIMH · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI NASH, DENIS, PARCESEPE, ANGELA · 2022 to 2022
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS UH3 AI133675NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH132360NIMH NIH HHS RF1MH132360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals who received their primary vaccine series only (with no subsequent booster) may be a new type of "moveable middle" given their receipt of the original COVID-19 vaccination. One population within the moveable middle for whom tailored interventions may be needed is individuals with common mental disorders (CMD). The purpose of this paper is to understand the vaccine perceptions among this new moveable middle-the undervaccinated-and within the undervaccinated to examine the extent to which COVID-19 vaccine perceptions and motivations differ among those with and without symptoms of CMD. Using data from the CHASING COVID Cohort, we examine the relationship between vaccination status, CMD, and vaccine perceptions in the undervaccinated. Among 510 undervaccinated participants who had completed the primary vaccine series but were not boosted, the most common reasons for undervaccination focused on efficacy (not seeing a need for an additional dose, 42.4%; there not being enough evidence that a booster dose is effective, 26.5%; already having had COVID-19, 19.6%). Other concerns were related to safety (long-term side effects, 21.0%; short-term side effects, 17.6%) and logistics (plan to get a booster but haven't had time yet, 18.8%). Overall, the greatest vaccine concerns (over 30%) for the undervaccinated focused on efficacy and safety issues. Symptoms of depression or anxiety were associated with lower levels of vaccine efficacy and greater safety concerns in adjusted models. The implications of our study are that campaigns that are hoping to maximize vaccination uptake should consider focusing on and emphasizing messaging on efficacy and safety issues.

Indexed as

COVID-19efficacysafetyundervaccinatedvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38005997
PMCPMC10675675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.