Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38005976›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Clinical Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Serological Testing and Defining a Correlate of Protection.

Kimia Sobhani, Susan Cheng, Raquel A Binder, Nicholas J Mantis, James M Crawford, Nkemakonam Okoye, Jonathan G Braun, Sandy Joung, Minhao Wang, Gerard Lozanski and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaccination versus natural infection: A review of antibody differentiation techniques.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kimia SobhaniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Susan ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4977-036X
Raquel A BinderDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8179-4145
Nicholas J MantisWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-8640
James M CrawfordDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.
Nkemakonam OkoyeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.
Jonathan G BraunDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-2974
Sandy JoungDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-3218
Minhao WangDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Gerard LozanskiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Christopher L KingDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University and Veterans Affairs Research Service, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
John D RobackDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Douglas A GrangerInstitute for Interdisciplinary Salivary Bioscience Research, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Suresh B BoppanaDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Microbiology, Heersink School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Amy B KargerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDonald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USCase Western Reserve University · USEmory University · USNew York State Department of Health · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI PENDLETON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Diversity and Determinants of the Immune-Inflammatory Response to SARS-CoV-2U54CA260591 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI FIGUEIREDO, JANE C., KARIN, MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$9.1M
Vaccine Induced Immune-Inflammatory Response and Cardiovascular RiskR01HL151828 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, SUSAN · 2021 to 2024
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NCI NIH HHS U54 CA260591NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we review established clinical use cases for SARS-CoV-2 antibody measures, which include diagnosis of recent prior infection, isolating high titer convalescent plasma, diagnosing multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and booster dosing in the immunosuppressed and other populations. We then address whether an antibody correlate of protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 has been successfully defined with the following considerations: Antibody responses in the immunocompetent, vaccine type, variants, use of binding antibody tests vs. neutralization tests, and endpoint measures. In the transition from the COVID-19 pandemic to endemic, there has been much interest in defining an antibody CoP. Due to the high mutability of respiratory viruses and our current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 variants defining a CoP for prevention of infection is unrealistic. However, a CoP may be defined for prevention of severe disease requiring hospitalization and/or death. Most SARS-CoV-2 CoP research has focused on neutralization measurements. However, there can be significant differences in neutralization test methods, and disparate responses to new variants depending on format. Furthermore, neutralization assays are often impractical for high throughput applications (e.g., assessing humoral immune response in populations or large cohorts). Nevertheless, CoP studies using neutralization measures are reviewed to determine where there is consensus. Alternatively, binding antibody tests could be used to define a CoP. Binding antibody assays tend to be highly automatable, high throughput, and therefore practical for large population applications. Again, we review studies for consensus on binding antibody responses to vaccines, focusing on standardized results. Binding antibodies directed against the S1 receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of the viral spike protein can provide a practical, indirect measure of neutralization. Initially, a response for S1-RBD antibodies may be selected that reflects the peak response in immunocompetent populations and may serve as a target for booster dosing in the immunocompromised. From existing studies reporting peak S1-RBD responses in standardized units, an approximate range of 1372-2744 BAU/mL for mRNA and recombinant protein vaccines was extracted that could serve as an initial CoP target. This target would need to be confirmed and potentially adjusted for updated vaccines, and almost certainly for other vaccine formats (i.e., viral vector). Alternatively, a threshold or response could be defined based on outcomes over time (i.e., prevention of severe disease). We also discuss the precedent for clinical measurement of antibodies for vaccine-preventable diseases (e.g., hepatitis B). Lastly, cellular immunity is briefly addressed for its importance in the nature and durability of protection.

Indexed as

antibodiesclinical utilitySARS-CoV-2serology

Identifiers

PMID38005976
PMCPMC10674881
OpenAlexW4388205603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.