Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38005856›Full record

ReviewViruses2023

Suitable Disinfectants with Proven Efficacy for Genetically Modified Viruses and Viral Vectors.

Maren Eggers, Ingeborg Schwebke, Johannes Blümel, Franziska Brandt, Helmut Fickenscher, Jürgen Gebel, Nils Hübner, Janis A Müller, Holger F Rabenau, Ingrid Rapp and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Molecular Engineering of Virus Tropism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maren EggersLaboratory Prof. Dr. G. Enders MVZ GbR, Rosenbergstr. 85, 70193 Stuttgart, Germany.
Ingeborg SchwebkeExpert Committee on Virus Disinfection of the German Association for the Control of Viral Diseases (DVV) e.V. and the Society for Virology (GfV) e.V., 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes BlümelPaul-Ehrlich-Institute, Department of Virology, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 51-56, 63225 Langen, Germany.
Franziska BrandtFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Helmut FickenscherInstitute for Infection Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Bruinswiker Straße 4, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Jürgen GebelVAH c/o Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nils HübnerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, W. Rathenaustr. 49, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Janis A MüllerInstitute of Virology, Hans-Meerwein Straße 2, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-416X
Holger F RabenauInstitute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ingrid RappBoehringer Ingelheim Therapeutics GmbH, Beim Braunland 1, 88416 Ochsenhausen, Germany.
Sven ReicheFriedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Department of Experimental Animal Facilities and Biorisk Management, Suedufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Eike SteinmannDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Jochen SteinmannDr. Bill + Partner GmbH Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Norderoog 2, 28259 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-8840
Paula ZwickerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, W. Rathenaustr. 49, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-7160
Miranda SuchomelInstitute of Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral disinfection is important for medical facilities, the food industry, and the veterinary field, especially in terms of controlling virus outbreaks. Therefore, standardized methods and activity levels are available for these areas. Usually, disinfectants used in these areas are characterized by their activity against test organisms (i.e., viruses, bacteria, and/or yeasts). This activity is usually determined using a suspension test in which the test organism is incubated with the respective disinfectant in solution to assess its bactericidal, yeasticidal, or virucidal activity. In addition, carrier methods that more closely reflect real-world applications have been developed, in which microorganisms are applied to the surface of a carrier (e.g., stainless steel frosted glass, or polyvinyl chloride (PVC)) and then dried. However, to date, no standardized methods have become available for addressing genetically modified vectors or disinfection-resistant oncolytic viruses such as the H1-parvovirus. Particularly, such non-enveloped viruses, which are highly resistant to disinfectants, are not taken into account in European standards. This article proposes a new activity claim known as "virucidal activity PLUS", summarizes the available methods for evaluating the virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants against genetically modified organisms (GMOs) using current European standards, including the activity against highly resistant parvoviridae such as the adeno-associated virus (AAV), and provides guidance on the selection of disinfectants for pharmaceutical manufacturers, laboratories, and clinical users.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsParvoviridae InfectionsParvovirusVirusesDisinfectionHumansDisinfectantsAAVdisinfectiongenetically modified organisms (GMOs)suspension testsvectorviral vectorsvirucidal activityvirus inactivation

Identifiers

PMID38005856
PMCPMC10675031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.