Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38005687›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Positive Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Microbes and Their Functionality in Agro-Ecosystems.

Weijia Liu, Zepeng Yang, Qinxin Ye, Zhaohui Peng, Shunxi Zhu, Honglin Chen, Dinghui Liu, Yiding Li, Liangji Deng, Xiangyang Shu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Organic amendments boost maize yield (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Plant growth-promoting microbes and microalgae-based biostimulants: sustainable strategy for agriculture and abiotic stress resilience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weijia LiuInstitute of Agricultural Bioenvironment and Energy, Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China.
Zepeng YangSoil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China.
Qinxin YeInstitute of Agricultural Bioenvironment and Energy, Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China.
Zhaohui PengInstitute of Agricultural Bioenvironment and Energy, Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China.
Shunxi ZhuInstitute of Agricultural Bioenvironment and Energy, Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China.
Honglin ChenSoil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China.
Dinghui LiuSoil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China.
Yiding LiCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Liangji DengCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Xiangyang ShuInstitute of Agricultural Bioenvironment and Energy, Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China.
Han HuangCollege of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2020JDRC0074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbial characteristics are considered to be an index for soil quality evaluation. It is generally believed that organic amendments replacing chemical fertilizers have positive effects on changing microbial activity and community structure. However, their effects on different agro-ecosystems on a global scale and their differences in different environmental conditions and experimental durations are unclear. This study performed a meta-analysis based on 94 studies with 204 observations to evaluate the overall effects and their differences in different experimental conditions and duration. The results indicated that compared to chemical fertilizer, organic amendments significantly increased total microbial biomass, bacterial biomass, fungal biomass, Gram-positive bacterial biomass and Gram-negative bacterial biomass, and had no effect on the ratio of fungi to bacteria and ratio of Gram-positive bacteria to Gram-negative bacteria. Meanwhile, land use type, mean annual precipitation and soil initial pH are essential factors affecting microbial activity response. Organic-amendment-induced shifts in microbial biomass can be predominantly explained by soil C and nutrient availability changes. Additionally, we observed positive relationships between microbial functionality and microbial biomass, suggesting that organic-amendment-induced changes in microbial activities improved soil microbial functionality.

Indexed as

agro-ecosystemcrop yieldmeta-analysismicrobesorganic amendmentssoil fertility

Identifiers

PMID38005687
PMCPMC10674390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.