ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
From Pulses to Sleep Stages: Towards Optimized Sleep Classification Using Heart-Rate Variability.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wearable Sleep-Stage Classification: A Systematic Analysis of Signal Modalities, Representations, and Multimodal Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Sleep Stage Classification During CPAP Therapy from CPAP-Airflow and Wearable Fingertip Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Automated sleep staging model for older adults based on CWT and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of automatic sleep stage classification using machine learning algorithms based on heart rate variability.Sleep and biological rhythms · 2025Review
- Non-guided, mobile, CBT-I-based sleep intervention in War-torn Ukraine: A feasibility study.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Effects of a CBT-I Based App-Program on Sleep Quality, Insomnia Severity, Psychological Strain and Quality of Life: A Pilot Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Orthosomnia in a General Population Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Exploring the bidirectional within-subject relationship between sleep and affective wellbeing: Insights from an intensive longitudinal study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
- Continuous sleep tracking in digital CBT-I: Efficacy and insights from a naturalistic-environment study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
More and more people quantify their sleep using wearables and are becoming obsessed in their pursuit of optimal sleep ("orthosomnia"). However, it is criticized that many of these wearables are giving inaccurate feedback and can even lead to negative daytime consequences. Acknowledging these facts, we here optimize our previously suggested sleep classification procedure in a new sample of 136 self-reported poor sleepers to minimize erroneous classification during ambulatory sleep sensing. Firstly, we introduce an advanced interbeat-interval (IBI) quality control using a random forest method to account for wearable recordings in naturalistic and more noisy settings. We further aim to improve sleep classification by opting for a loss function model instead of the overall epoch-by-epoch accuracy to avoid model biases towards the majority class (i.e., "light sleep"). Using these implementations, we compare the classification performance between the optimized (loss function model) and the accuracy model. We use signals derived from PSG, one-channel ECG, and two consumer wearables: the ECG breast belt Polar® H10 (H10) and the Polar® Verity Sense (VS), an optical Photoplethysmography (PPG) heart-rate sensor. The results reveal a high overall accuracy for the loss function in ECG (86.3 %, κ = 0.79), as well as the H10 (84.4%, κ = 0.76), and VS (84.2%, κ = 0.75) sensors, with improvements in deep sleep and wake. In addition, the new optimized model displays moderate to high correlations and agreement with PSG on primary sleep parameters, while measures of reliability, expressed in intra-class correlations, suggest excellent reliability for most sleep parameters. Finally, it is demonstrated that the new model is still classifying sleep accurately in 4-classes in users taking heart-affecting and/or psychoactive medication, which can be considered a prerequisite in older individuals with or without common disorders. Further improving and validating automatic sleep stage classification algorithms based on signals from affordable wearables may resolve existing scepticism and open the door for such approaches in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.