Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38005450›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Novel Machine-Learning Framework Based on a Hierarchy of Dispute Models for the Identification of Fish Species Using Multi-Mode Spectroscopy.

Mitchell Sueker, Amirreza Daghighi, Alireza Akhbardeh, Nicholas MacKinnon, Gregory Bearman, Insuck Baek, Chansong Hwang, Jianwei Qin, Amanda M Tabb, Jiahleen B Roungchun and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mitchell SuekerBiomedical Engineering Program, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Amirreza DaghighiSafetySpect Inc., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Alireza AkhbardehSafetySpect Inc., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Nicholas MacKinnonSafetySpect Inc., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7124-7420
Gregory BearmanSafetySpect Inc., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Insuck BaekUSDA ARS Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1044-349X
Chansong HwangUSDA ARS Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Jianwei QinUSDA ARS Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-4373
Amanda M TabbFood Science Program, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Jiahleen B RoungchunFood Science Program, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Rosalee S HellbergFood Science Program, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3953-2007
Fartash VasefiSafetySpect Inc., Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Moon KimUSDA ARS Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Kouhyar TavakolianBiomedical Engineering Program, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-358X
Hossein Kashani ZadehBiomedical Engineering Program, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.

Funding

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NA21OAR0210305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seafood mislabeling rates of approximately 20% have been reported globally. Traditional methods for fish species identification, such as DNA analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are expensive and time-consuming, and require skilled technicians and specialized equipment. The combination of spectroscopy and machine learning presents a promising approach to overcome these challenges. In our study, we took a comprehensive approach by considering a total of 43 different fish species and employing three modes of spectroscopy: fluorescence (Fluor), and reflectance in the visible near-infrared (VNIR) and short-wave near-infrared (SWIR). To achieve higher accuracies, we developed a novel machine-learning framework, where groups of similar fish types were identified and specialized classifiers were trained for each group. The incorporation of global (single artificial intelligence for all species) and dispute classification models created a hierarchical decision process, yielding higher performances. For Fluor, VNIR, and SWIR, accuracies increased from 80%, 75%, and 49% to 83%, 81%, and 58%, respectively. Furthermore, certain species witnessed remarkable performance enhancements of up to 40% in single-mode identification. The fusion of all three spectroscopic modes further boosted the performance of the best single mode, averaged over all species, by 9%. Fish species mislabeling not only poses health-related risks due to contaminants, toxins, and allergens that could be life-threatening, but also gives rise to economic and environmental hazards and loss of nutritional benefits. Our proposed method can detect fish fraud as a real-time alternative to DNA barcoding and other standard methods. The hierarchical system of dispute models proposed in this work is a novel machine-learning tool not limited to this application, and can improve accuracy in any classification problem which contains a large number of classes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDissent and DisputesAnimalsFishesMachine LearningSpectrum Analysisclassificationdata fusiondeep learningdispute modelsfish fraudulencefish species identificationmachine learningmulti-mode spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38005450
PMCPMC10674920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.