ArticleMicromachines2023
Material Extrusion Filament Width and Height Prediction via Design of Experiment and Machine Learning.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Informed Hydrogel Biomaterials in Additive Manufacturing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Classification of LED Packages for Quality Control by Discriminant Analysis, Neural Network and Decision Tree.Micromachines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dimensions of material extrusion 3D printing filaments play a pivotal role in determining processing resolution and efficiency and are influenced by processing parameters. This study focuses on four key process parameters, namely, nozzle diameter, nondimensional nozzle height, extrusion pressure, and printing speed. The design of experiment was carried out to determine the impact of various factors and interaction effects on filament width and height through variance analysis. Five machine learning models (support vector regression, backpropagation neural network, decision tree, random forest, and K-nearest neighbor) were built to predict the geometric dimension of filaments. The models exhibited good predictive performance. The coefficients of determination of the backpropagation neural network model for predicting line width and line height were 0.9025 and 0.9604, respectively. The effect of various process parameters on the geometric morphology based on the established prediction model was also studied. The order of influence on line width and height, ranked from highest to lowest, was as follows: nozzle diameter, printing speed, extrusion pressure, and nondimensional nozzle height. Different nondimensional nozzle height settings may cause the extruded material to be stretched or squeezed. The material being in a stretched state leads to a thin filament, and the regularity of processing parameters on the geometric size is not strong. Meanwhile, the nozzle diameter exhibits a significant impact on dimensions when the material is in a squeezing state. Thus, this study can be used to predict the size of printing filament structures, guide the selection of printing parameters, and determine the size of 3D printing layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.