Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38004946›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

Modeling a Fluid-Coupled Single Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Using the Finite Difference Method.

Valentin Goepfert, Audren Boulmé, Franck Levassort, Tony Merrien, Rémi Rouffaud, Dominique Certon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentin GoepfertGREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.
Audren BoulméMODULEUS SAS, 37100 Tours, France.
Franck LevassortGREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-9390
Tony MerrienMODULEUS SAS, 37100 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-0831
Rémi RouffaudGREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2752-5459
Dominique CertonGREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A complete model was developed to simulate the behavior of a circular clamped axisymmetric fluid-coupled Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT). Combining Finite Difference and Boundary Element Matrix (FD-BEM), this model is based on the discretization of the partial differential equation used to translate the mechanical behavior of a PMUT. In the model, both the axial and the transverse displacements are preserved in the equation of motion and used to properly define the neutral line position. To introduce fluid coupling, a Green's function dedicated to axisymmetric circular radiating sources is employed. The resolution of the behavioral equations is used to establish the equivalent electroacoustic circuit of a PMUT that preserves the average particular velocity, the mechanical power, and the acoustic power. Particular consideration is given to verifying the validity of certain assumptions that are usually made across various steps of previously reported analytical models. In this framework, the advantages of the membrane discretization performed in the FD-BEM model are highlighted through accurate simulations of the first vibration mode and especially the cutoff frequency that many other models do not predict. This high cutoff frequency corresponds to cases where the spatial average velocity of the plate is null and is of great importance for PMUT design because it defines the upper limit above which the device is considered to be mechanically blocked. These modeling results are compared with electrical and dynamic membrane displacement measurements of AlN-based (500 nm thick) PMUTs in air and fluid. The first resonance frequency confrontation showed a maximum relative error of 1.13% between the FD model and Finite Element Method (FEM). Moreover, the model perfectly predicts displacement amplitudes when PMUT vibrates in a fluid, with less than 5% relative error. Displacement amplitudes of 16 nm and 20 nm were measured for PMUT with 340 µm and 275 µm diameters, respectively. This complete PMUT model using the FD-BEM approach is shown to be very efficient in terms of computation time and accuracy.

Indexed as

characterizationfinite difference methodlumped-elementMEMSPMUTultrasoundvibrometry

Identifiers

PMID38004946
PMCPMC10673182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.