Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38004833›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

Experimental Study of the Surface Quality of Form-Cutting Tools Manufactured via Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Using Different Process Parameters.

Amir Alinaghizadeh, Mohammadjafar Hadad, Bahman Azarhoushang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amir AlinaghizadehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering-Manufacturing Group, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish 1591634311, Iran.
Mohammadjafar HadadSchool of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran.
Bahman AzarhoushangInstitute of Precision Machining (KSF), Hochschule Furtwangen University, 78532 Tuttlingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Form-cutting tools are an economical choice for turning parts with defined profiles in mass production. The effects of the form contour of these tools-produced by the wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) process-on tool quality were investigated in this research. This study focuses on reducing the adverse effects of the recast layer induced by WEDM on form-cutting tools. The basic component types of profile forms in form-cutting tools can be summarized by a combination of four modes, i.e., concave and convex arcs and flat and oblique surfaces. Hence, sample cutting tools with three different radii of convex and concave arcs and a flat surface were produced. During the WEDM operation, one-pass mode was used for roughing, two passes for semi-finishing, and three passes for finishing. Furthermore, the difference between the percentage of oxygen and carbon elements on the recast layer in the two areas above the workpiece or wire entry point and the bottom area of the workpiece or wire exit point was investigated. Finally, the influences of the direction, size of the curvature, and the number of passes in the wire electric discharge process on the recast layer were analyzed. It was observed that the recast layer thickness could be reduced by increasing the number of WEDM process. Additionally, the uniformity of the cutting contour was superior in the entry region of the wire going into the workpiece compared with the exit region of the wire.

Indexed as

form-cutting toolsform machiningrecast layersurface qualitywire electrical discharge machining

Identifiers

PMID38004833
PMCPMC10673038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.