Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38004741›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Vera Yaderets, Nataliya Karpova, Elena Glagoleva, Alexandra Shibaeva, Vakhtang Dzhavakhiya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vera YaderetsLaboratory of Biotechnology of Industrial Microorganisms, Department of Biotechnology and Technology of Bioorganic Synthesis Products, Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), Moscow 125080, Russia.
Nataliya KarpovaLaboratory of Biotechnology of Industrial Microorganisms, Department of Biotechnology and Technology of Bioorganic Synthesis Products, Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), Moscow 125080, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-4136
Elena GlagolevaLaboratory of Biotechnology of Industrial Microorganisms, Department of Biotechnology and Technology of Bioorganic Synthesis Products, Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), Moscow 125080, Russia.
Alexandra ShibaevaLaboratory of Biotechnology of Industrial Microorganisms, Department of Biotechnology and Technology of Bioorganic Synthesis Products, Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), Moscow 125080, Russia.
Vakhtang DzhavakhiyaLaboratory of Biotechnology of Industrial Microorganisms, Department of Biotechnology and Technology of Bioorganic Synthesis Products, Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), Moscow 125080, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 123012000071-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The normal functioning of a gastrointestinal microflora in poultry and livestock is of significant importance, since its imbalance negatively influences an organism's functions. In this study, the UV mutagenesis and selection were used to obtain two

Indexed as

antagonistic activityBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisfeed additiveprobiotic strains

Identifiers

PMID38004741
PMCPMC10672880
OpenAlexW4388491312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.