Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38004687›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

Developments and Prospects of Farmland Application of Biogas Slurry in China-A Review.

Zichen Wang, Isaac A Sanusi, Jidong Wang, Xiaomei Ye, Evariste B Gueguim Kana, Ademola O Olaniran, Hongbo Shao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zichen WangInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-3735
Isaac A SanusiDiscipline of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-8256
Jidong WangInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Xiaomei YeKey Laboratory of Crop and Livestock Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China.
Evariste B Gueguim KanaDiscipline of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 4000, South Africa.
Ademola O OlaniranDiscipline of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0586-0558
Hongbo ShaoInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-5485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biogas slurry (BS) is an attractive agricultural waste resource which can be used to regulate soil microbial communities, enhance nutrient absorption capacity of crops, promote plant-soil interactions, and consequently, increase crop productivity. Presently, BS discharge is not environmentally friendly. It is therefore necessary to explore alternative efficient utilization of BS. The use of BS as fertilizer meets the requirements for sustainable and eco-friendly development in agriculture, but this has not been fully actualized. Hence, this paper reviewed the advantages of using BS in farmland as soil fertilization for the improvement of crop production and quality. This review also highlighted the potential of BS for the prevention and control of soil acidification, salinization, as well as improve microbial structure and soil enzyme activity. Moreover, this review reports on the current techniques, application methods, relevant engineering measures, environmental benefits, challenges, and prospects associated with BS utilization. Lastly, additional research efforts require for optimal utilization of BS in farmlands were elucidated.

Indexed as

anaerobic digestion effluentbiogas slurryenvironmental stressharsh environmentsliquid digestatemicroorganismsplant–soil interactions

Identifiers

PMID38004687
PMCPMC10673569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.