Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38004163›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Instruments to Evaluate Food Neophobia in Children: An Integrative Review with a Systematic Approach.

Julyana Nogueira Firme, Priscila Claudino de Almeida, Emanuele Batistela Dos Santos, Renata Puppin Zandonadi, António Raposo, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julyana Nogueira FirmeHuman Nutrition Graduate Program, Nutrition Departament, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4950-7115
Priscila Claudino de AlmeidaHuman Nutrition Graduate Program, Nutrition Departament, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-0112
Emanuele Batistela Dos SantosHuman Nutrition Graduate Program, Nutrition Departament, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Renata Puppin ZandonadiNutrition Departament, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-2249
Raquel Braz Assunção BotelhoNutrition Departament, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-287X
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food neophobia (FN), a frequent disorder in childhood, profoundly impacts the quality of a diet, restricting the intake of nutrients to maintain proper nutrition. Therefore, using the appropriate tools to assess FN in children to promote healthy eating habits is essential. The study aimed to develop an integrative review with a systematic approach to identify the instruments to measure FN in children and analyze their differences. The included studies (n = 17) were more concentrated in Europe, demonstrating the possible lack of dissemination of the topic at a global level. Among the 18 tools, 6 were represented by adaptations of the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) and the Children's Food Neophobia Scale (CFNS), and one was the CFNS itself, demonstrating the relevance of these pioneering tools. The need to meet mainly cultural and cognitive criteria led to the creation of other instruments (n = 11). A diversity of approaches concerning the respondents, age range, items, scales, and validation methods was revealed. Modifications to the tools in some nations highlighted their adaptability and effectiveness in addressing regional variations. The instruments can contribute to additional research to help us better understand the prevalence of FN in children, resulting in their health and well-being.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderChildDietDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesHumansNutritional StatusSurveys and Questionnaireschildrenevaluationfood neophobiainstruments

Identifiers

PMID38004163
PMCPMC10675136
OpenAlexW4388639075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.