Pituitary-Related Adverse Events and Onset Patterns Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Analysis Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Pharmacovigilance analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated optic nerve toxicity based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
   Article
2. Targeting lineage-specific heterogeneity and hypovascular-fibrotic barriers may enable precision immunotherapy in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as