Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38003898›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

The Impact of Antibiotics and Steroids on the Nasal Microbiome in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review According to PICO Criteria.

Antonella Loperfido, Carlo Cavaliere, Elona Begvarfaj, Andrea Ciofalo, Giovanni D'Erme, Marco De Vincentiis, Antonio Greco, Stefano Millarelli, Gianluca Bellocchi, Simonetta Masieri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Multi-Omics Reveal the Potential Associations ofJournal of inflammation research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonella LoperfidoOtolaryngology Unit, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7174-8126
Carlo CavaliereDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Elona BegvarfajDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6960-2822
Andrea CiofaloDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1468-459X
Giovanni D'ErmeUOC Otorinolaringoiatria, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Marco De VincentiisDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Antonio GrecoDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-9871
Stefano MillarelliOtolaryngology Unit, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Gianluca BellocchiOtolaryngology Unit, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-3309
Simonetta MasieriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-9505
Sapienza University of Rome · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nasal microbiome represents the main environmental factor of the inflammatory process in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Antibiotics and steroids constitute the mainstay of CRS therapies. However, their impact on microbial communities needs to be better understood. This systematic review summarizes the evidence about antibiotics' and steroids' impact on the nasal microbiota in patients with CRS.

methodsThe search strategy was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. The authors searched all papers in the three major medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) using the PICO tool (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). The search was carried out using a combination of the key terms "Microbiota" or "Microbiome" and "Chronic Rhinosinusitis".

resultsOverall, 402 papers were identified, and after duplicate removal (127 papers), excluding papers off-topic (154) and for other structural reasons (110), papers were assessed for eligibility; finally, only 11 papers were included and summarized in the present systematic review. Some authors used only steroids, other researchers used only antibiotics, and others used both antibiotics and steroids. With regard to the use of steroids as exclusive medical treatment, topical mometasone and budesonide were investigated. With regard to the use of antibiotics as exclusive medical treatments, clarithromycin, doxycycline, roxithromycin, and amoxicillin clavulanate were investigated. Regarding the use of both antibiotics and steroids, two associations were investigated: systemic prednisone combined with amoxicillin clavulanate and topical budesonide combined with azithromycin.

conclusionsThe impact that therapies can have on the nasal microbiome of CRS patients is very varied. Further studies are needed to understand the role of the nasal microbiome, prevent CRS, and improve therapeutic tools for personalized medicine tailored to the individual patient.

Indexed as

antibiotic therapychronic rhinosinusitismicrobiomemicrobiotasteroid therapy

Identifiers

PMID38003898
PMCPMC10671981
OpenAlexW4388452927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.