ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Identifying N6-Methyladenosine Sites in HepG2 Cell Lines Using Oxford Nanopore Technology.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Dynamic modulation of N6-methyladenosine by ionizing radiation in human cells.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Unraveling the hidden complexity of cancer through long-read sequencing.Genome research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RNA modifications, particularly N6-methyladenosine (m6A), are pivotal regulators of RNA functionality and cellular processes. We analyzed m6A modifications by employing Oxford Nanopore technology and the m6Anet algorithm, focusing on the HepG2 cell line. We identified 3968 potential m6A modification sites in 2851 transcripts, corresponding to 1396 genes. A gene functional analysis revealed the active involvement of m6A-modified genes in ubiquitination, transcription regulation, and protein folding processes, aligning with the known role of m6A modifications in histone ubiquitination in cancer. To ensure data robustness, we assessed reproducibility across technical replicates. This study underscores the importance of evaluating algorithmic reproducibility, especially in supervised learning. Furthermore, we examined correlations between transcriptomic, translatomic, and proteomic levels. A strong transcriptomic-translatomic correlation was observed. In conclusion, our study deepens our understanding of m6A modifications' multifaceted impacts on cellular processes and underscores the importance of addressing reproducibility concerns in analytical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.