Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38003155›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Using Sound Location to Monitor Farrowing in Sows.

Elaine van Erp-van der Kooij, Lois F de Graaf, Dennis A de Kruijff, Daphne Pellegrom, Renilda de Rooij, Nian I T Welters, Jeroen van Poppel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elaine van Erp-van der KooijDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-0107
Lois F de GraafDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Dennis A de KruijffDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Daphne PellegromDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Renilda de RooijDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Nian I T WeltersDepartment of Applied Biology, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Jeroen van PoppelDepartment of Animal Husbandry, HAS Green Academy, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90108, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
HAS green academy · NL

Funding

Holland High Tech HTSM 21.0382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision Livestock Farming systems can help pig farmers prevent health and welfare issues around farrowing. Five sows were monitored in two field studies. A Sorama L642V sound camera, visualising sound sources as coloured spots using a 64-microphone array, and a Bascom XD10-4 security camera with a built-in microphone were used in a farrowing unit. Firstly, sound spots were compared with audible sounds, using the Observer XT (Noldus Information Technology), analysing video data at normal speed. This gave many false positives, including visible sound spots without audible sounds. In total, 23 of 50 piglet births were visible, but none were audible. The sow's behaviour changed when farrowing started. One piglet was silently crushed. Secondly, data were analysed at a 10-fold slower speed when comparing sound spots with audible sounds and sow behaviour. This improved results, but accuracy and specificity were still low. When combining audible sound with visible sow behaviour and comparing sound spots with combined sound and behaviour, the accuracy was 91.2%, the error was 8.8%, the sensitivity was 99.6%, and the specificity was 69.7%. We conclude that sound cameras are promising tools, detecting sound more accurately than the human ear. There is potential to use sound cameras to detect the onset of farrowing, but more research is needed to detect piglet births or crushing.

Indexed as

animal welfarebehaviourpiglet crushingpigssound camera

Identifiers

PMID38003155
PMCPMC10668711
OpenAlexW4388731831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.