Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38003070›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Refinement of Animal Experiments: Replacing Traumatic Methods of Laboratory Animal Marking with Non-Invasive Alternatives.

Ilya Klabukov, Victoria Shestakova, Olga Krasilnikova, Anna Smirnova, Olga Abramova, Denis Baranovskii, Dmitri Atiakshin, Andrey A Kostin, Peter Shegay, Andrey D Kaprin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AAT-MSC-EVs: Novel implications for suppressing ferroptosis, fibrosis and pain associated with chronic pancreatitis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Refining In-Cage Enrichment for Specialized Mouse Scenarios.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. RapidFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ilya KlabukovNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-7999
Victoria ShestakovaNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-8750
Olga KrasilnikovaNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.
Anna SmirnovaNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.
Olga AbramovaNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-1439
Denis BaranovskiiNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.
Dmitri AtiakshinScientific and Educational Resource Center for Innovative Technologies of Immunophenotyping, Digital Spatial Profiling and Ultrastructural Analysis, Patrice Lumumba Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-4556
Andrey A KostinDepartment of Urology and Operative Nephrology, Patrice Lumumba Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Peter ShegayNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.
Andrey D KaprinNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Agreement No. 075-15-2021-1356 issued October 7, 2021 (15.CIN.21.0011, RF ID 0951.61321X0012)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable methods for identifying rodents play an important role in ensuring the success of preclinical studies. However, animal identification remains a trivial laboratory routine that is not often discussed, despite the fact that more than 6 million rodents are used in animal studies each year. Currently, there are extensive regulations in place to ensure adequate anesthesia and to reduce animal suffering during experiments. At the same time, not enough attention is paid to the comfort of rodents during routine identification procedures, which can be painful and cause some complications. In order to achieve the highest ethical standards in laboratory research, we must minimize animal discomfort during the identification phase. In this article, we discuss traumatic methods of identification and describe several painless methods for marking in long-term experimental studies. The use of non-traumatic and non-invasive methods requires the renewal of marks as they fade and additional handling of the rodents. Laboratory personnel must be trained in stress-minimizing handling techniques to make mark renewal less stressful.

Indexed as

animal experimentanimal markinganimalsanimal welfarebioethicsethicsmouseratrodent

Identifiers

PMID38003070
PMCPMC10668729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.