Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38003008›Full record

ReviewGenes2023

Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance.

Elena A Ponomarenko, George S Krasnov, Olga I Kiseleva, Polina A Kryukova, Viktoriia A Arzumanian, Georgii V Dolgalev, Ekaterina V Ilgisonis, Andrey V Lisitsa, Ekaterina V Poverennaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TPC2 regulates proteomic remodeling, bioenergetic phenotypes, and mitochondrial stress adaptation in melanoma.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena A PonomarenkoInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.
George S KrasnovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6493-8378
Olga I KiselevaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-1983
Polina A KryukovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.
Viktoriia A ArzumanianInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3658-2490
Georgii V DolgalevInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-6279
Ekaterina V IlgisonisInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.
Andrey V LisitsaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.
Ekaterina V PoverennayaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119121, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-3604

Funding

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-933, unique project ID: RF00121X0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomics methods (RNA-Seq, PCR) today are more routine and reproducible than proteomics methods, i.e., both mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis. For this reason, most scientific studies are limited to assessing the level of mRNA content. At the same time, protein content (and its post-translational status) largely determines the cell's state and behavior. Such a forced extrapolation of conclusions from the transcriptome to the proteome often seems unjustified. The ratios of "transcript-protein" pairs can vary by several orders of magnitude for different genes. As a rule, the correlation coefficient between transcriptome-proteome levels for different tissues does not exceed 0.3-0.5. Several characteristics determine the ratio between the content of mRNA and protein: among them, the rate of movement of the ribosome along the mRNA and the number of free ribosomes in the cell, the availability of tRNA, the secondary structure, and the localization of the transcript. The technical features of the experimental methods also significantly influence the levels of the transcript and protein of the corresponding gene on the outcome of the comparison. Given the above biological features and the performance of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, one may develop various models to predict proteomic profiles based on transcriptomic data. This review is devoted to the ability of RNA sequencing methods for protein abundance prediction.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsGene Expression ProfilingRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeProteomeRNA, Messengergene expressionmass spectrometrymRNA-to-protein ratioNGSprotein abundanceproteomeRNA-Seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38003008
PMCPMC10671741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.